Contemporary Issuesin the Government Ano Aoministration of Latin American Megacities
نویسنده
چکیده
Thispaper is the first to systematical/y analyze and compare the structures of city governance and administration for seven maior cities in LatinAmerica, four of which are megacities (population of over 10millionJ, and three others are large national capitais. U.S.and U. K.models of city administration are reviewed as baseline models against which differences in LatinAmerican may be explored. Structures of Government in LatinAmerica show several important features and trenas: 1) the lack of metropolitan (cross;urisdictional) authority; 2) the existence of strong mayors and weak councils"; 3) high leveis of partisanship; 4) overlapping rather than interlocking bureaucracies; 5) pressures towards the privatization of city services. but continuing tension over the desirability of public versus private control; 6)greater fiscal responsibility and autonomy; and 7), a continuing marginalization of public participation in megacity governance./n spite of these features, many cities throughout the region (regardless of whether they are megacity size or national capitais), are actively intensifying their efforts to develop more effedive, accountable and democratic governance structures. A preliminary version of this paper was first presented at a meeting on "Latin American Megacities" organized by United Nations University in Mexico City in November 1993.
منابع مشابه
Micro-social and Contextual Sources of Democratic Attitudes in Latin America
Many Latin American countries democratized between 1975 and 2000, and research has confirmed that contemporary Latin Americans hold democratic political attitudes. Using AmericasBarometer surveys of 18 countries from 2008, we examine the commitment of Latin Americans to three democratic attitudes – preference for democracy over other forms of government, support for general participation rights...
متن کاملIncome Convergence toward USA: New Evidences for Latin and South American Countries
Abstract In this paper we test two versions of convergence hypothesis namely deterministic or conditional convergence and stochastic or catching up hypothesis using Carrion-i-Silvestre et al. (2005) stationary test. The results show Latin and South American countries (LSA) catching up process toward the USA failed in 1980s and somewhat in 1990s. But in 2000s most of them could lie in converge...
متن کاملA Comparison of Relationship between Text and Picture in the Selected Iranian and Contemporary American-European Illustrated-Fiction Books Based on the Theory of Maria Nikolajeva and Carole Scott
Illustrated-fiction books are special forms of art that are the combination of text and picture. The relationship between text and picture in this genre is diverse and variegated, and has different effects on the audience; however, little research has been done about it. The goal of this research is to compare text/picture relationship in the selected Iranian and contemporary American-European ...
متن کاملWhen Foreign Policy Meets Social Demands in Latin America *
In order to introduce this special issue of Contexto Internacional, we first seek to provide a panoramic understanding of the Latin American political landscape. Next, we consider the new (and not so new) development strategies adopted by Latin American states, and their implications for foreign policy and international relations. Following this, we offer a brief review of the literature on Lat...
متن کاملLatin American Presidencies Interrupted
Almost 25 years have passed since Latin America began what has turned out to be the fullest and most enduring experience it has ever had with constitutional democracy. While dictatorships were the norm in the 1960s and 1970s—only Colombia, Costa Rica, and Venezuela avoided authoritarian rule during those decades—today an elected government rules in every Latin American country except Cuba and H...
متن کامل